Credit: Christine Matheny

Max Matheny, a pupil with dyslexia, in front of the office of Gov. Jerry Brown in 2015.

Max Matheny, 13, wore his Sacramento duds – black adjust paired with a lime shirt, topped with a newsboy cap – up to the Capitol five times this yr, conveying a wrinkled copy of his speech communication in a book purse. "I'm really smart, with an IQ higher than average," he told the state Senate Didactics Committee final summer. This was hard-won self-knowledge, the farthest matter from 8th-grade braggadocio.

"Up until this past January, I read at a 2nd-form level," he told the senators.

Max has dyslexia, a reading inability thought to originate in the neurological structure of the brain. The words "smart" and "special instruction" aren't spoken together often past educators, but Max, perched on a swivel chair before a microphone, did just that with the legislators. He told them he was smart, he had not received the right instruction for dyslexia in 7 years of special education and he wanted the legislators to exercise something virtually it.

"I'm really smart," said Max Matheny, xiii, a pupil with dyslexia.

They did. This month, Gov. Jerry Brownish signed into law Assembly Nib 1369, authored by Assemblyman Jim Frazier, D-Oakley. The new police requires schools to assess struggling readers specifically for dyslexia, the most prevalent learning inability in the U.S. and a disorder that affects as many every bit eighty percent of California students with learning disabilities in special education, according to Kathy Futterman, a supervisor in educational psychology and teacher didactics at California State University East Bay.

In addition, the police requires the California Department of Education, by the showtime of the 2017-eighteen school twelvemonth, to post information on its website to help teachers observe a proven, evidence-based approach for teaching reading to students with dyslexia. Such approaches, which include Orton-Gillingham and Wilson Linguistic communication Training, involve straight teaching in breaking the "code" of letters and sounds. The law does not include 2 requirements initially sought by the grassroots organization that sponsored the legislation, Decoding Dyslexia California: that districts be required to use the tools posted on the California Department of Educational activity website and that students in M-3 exist screened for dyslexia.

Proponents of the constabulary describe a dire situation in school for students with dyslexia, a condition that is and then commonly conflated with low intelligence by teachers and parents that advocates have a ready listing of impressive individuals who are dyslexic, including Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Supreme Courtroom litigator David Boies and Nobel Prize winner Ballad Greider.

Amid the most baffling experiences for students with dyslexia, according to Decoding Dyslexia California, is that many school staff tell parents there is no such thing as dyslexia or that dyslexia is not a disability. Some districts pass up to say the word at all.

"I was told, 'We do not use the give-and-take dyslexia,'" said Holly Snyder, a member of Decoding Dyslexia California and a Sacramento-area parent whose 9-year-onetime son Ty has dyslexia.

"I remember near school psychologists prefer the term 'specific learning disability,'" said Barbara D'Incau, a past president of the California Association of School Psychologists. "Although nosotros accept been reluctant to use the word dyslexia, it's clearly in common usage and you're going to come across teachers and school psychologists utilise information technology much more."

The avoidance of the word has become such an upshot that the federal Office of Special Instruction and Rehabilitation released a "Dearest Colleague" guidance letter on October. 23 encouraging country offices of education and local school districts to ensure that their policies don't prohibit the use of "dyslexia."

The letter followed a tweet earlier this calendar month, which is Dyslexia Sensation Month, from U.Due south. Secretary of Didactics Arne Duncan:

Dyslexia "is notwithstanding not recognized past most public schools," said the Southern California Tri-Counties Branch of the International Dyslexia Association in a statement in back up of the law. This is true, the group noted, fifty-fifty though dyslexia has been included in the California Education Code since 1990 and is included as a "specific learning disability" in the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Deed.

"This is educational malpractice," Snyder told the Assembly Education Committee before this year. "We know how to treat this."

She added in an interview, "The ironic twist in this whole story is that I'm a kindergarten teacher and I didn't know what dyslexia was. There's no teacher training, no classes."

As a result, with many schools not looking for signs of dyslexia or providing evidence-based interventions, parents of struggling readers are left floundering, said Riverside-surface area parent Jennifer Biang, who founded Decoding Dyslexia California in 2013. But now they are mobilizing, Biang said. Since 2011, when the original Decoding Dyslexia group was founded in New Jersey, the organization has become a national network with chapters in all 50 states.

Biang says she fields calls from parents who are all only resigned to their kid'southward academic failure because of dyslexia. "I explain to them that dyslexia is not a cognitive disability," Biang said. Let the schoolhouse handle it, they say. "No services, no understanding of dyslexia" is how Biang describes the three school districts her daughter, Violet, xvi, who has dyslexia, has attended. Biang explains to these parents that they are probably going to have to get involved.

The law was opposed by the Special Didactics Local Plan Area (SELPA) Administrators of California, an organization of leaders of regional agencies that oversee special didactics in the state, and the California Association of School Psychologists. In an apparent misstep, the special education administrators group released a statement that it opposed the pecker in part because information technology was inappropriate to screen students for letter reversals – writing the letter of the alphabet "b" instead of "d" – before tertiary form.

But screening for alphabetic character reversals is not how students are identified every bit dyslexic, said Kelli Sandman-Hurley, a co-founder of the San Diego-based Dyslexia Preparation Institute, who supported the neb. "Dyslexia is not seeing things backwards," she said. "What was fascinating is they even put that in writing. I idea, 'You just explained to the whole state how much we demand this law.'"

The legislation will require schools that are testing struggling readers to test students' "phonological processing," which is the ability to discriminate and manipulate sounds at the judgement, word, syllable and individual sound level. A difficulty in phonological processing is a defining characteristic of dyslexia, according to the International Dyslexia Association, but a trait school psychologists frequently aren't testing for, according to Futterman at Cal Land East Bay. "My opinion is that people are not well versed, well trained or well educated in language-based learning disabilities," Futterman said. "They are not able to do a differential diagnosis."

Nearly teachers, including those in special educational activity, aren't taught to utilise evidenced-based reading interventions, co-ordinate to the National Council on Instructor Quality, a nonpartisan research grouping in Washington, D.C. The council looked at 64 programs in California that prepare elementary school teachers and found that more than half did not cover the scientific discipline of reading – how the encephalon processes data to decode sounds and words, said Sandi Jacobs, senior vice president of state and commune policy for the council.

And while the California Association of School Psychologists opposed the law on the grounds that "phonological processing" assessments were already allowed, and that the police force needed to clearly state that school psychologists would bear the assessments as usual, the organization is now advocating for improved services for students with dyslexia.

D'Incau said the group is preparing a position paper with recommendations for the California Department of Education. These include identifying students in grades Thou-two who have the characteristics of dyslexia and providing early interventions. In addition, the psychologists volition recommend that the California Committee on Teacher Credentialing improve educator and school psychologist training in how to accost dyslexia, she said.

Max, who lives in Aptos, finally is receiving an intervention designed for dyslexic students. In the first iv months of the programme, his reading level jumped from 2nd form to the mid-yr of tertiary grade. "I'm glad they are teaching me at present," Max told the legislators. "I had given up hope before. I merely thought I was too stupid to acquire how to read."

To become more reports like this ane, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-toll daily email on latest developments in pedagogy.